Freaks are underpaid

While perusing Careerbuilder today, I stumbled upon this interesting position.

Ten bucks an hour? Do you realize how many hours of nakedness you’d have to pull off to make a living?

Poor nudists. Always taken advantage of.

kevin wrote:
if you look at it from the perspective that people usually have to pay (whether it be fines or nudist colony fees) to be in public naked, it’s really a pretty good deal.
Posted 06 Aug 2007 at 18:22 ¶
Matt Stooks wrote:
But when you offer that low a price, you guarantee the only people you’ll get are nudists. This group is a little too comfortable with how they look at all times to be attractive.

If you were to raise the wage, you might be able to coax some potentially attractive non-nudists into trying it out.
Posted 06 Aug 2007 at 18:42 ¶
Jeri Anne wrote:
Whoa, that’s more than I make at the station! I’m transferring back to Washburn!!!
Posted 07 Aug 2007 at 00:06 ¶
DB wrote:
The ad says, “Start at $10/hr…” What sort of performance is necessary to get a raise? What if two people started at the same time and one of them got a raise after a few weeks and the other didn’t? If the person who didn’t get a raise found out that the other model got more money, that would be devastating.
Posted 08 Aug 2007 at 01:41 ¶
Matt Stooks wrote:
Maybe the raise is contingent on your ability to remain unchanged by cold weather or an attractive freshman in the front row. I do see the problem, though, DB.
Posted 08 Aug 2007 at 04:46 ¶

Matt Stooks